By Jennifer C. King, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, GO2 for Lung Cancer

Are scientists learning enough about how people just like you respond to new treatments? You may be surprised. Clinical trial participation rates among people with cancer in the United States are low, with only about 8% of those diagnosed joining a trial1. Unfortunately, it is hard to learn about treatments and their effects in a normal healthcare setting because it is difficult to combine data from different doctors and healthcare systems. That means that data from clinical trials provide the most complete information about how new treatments work and for whom.

Where this becomes a problem is when you look at who is participating in clinical trials. Those who enroll are generally younger and healthier than the average patient. Among people with cancer in the U.S. that participate in clinical trials, only 6% are Black, 3% are Asian American, and 2% are Hispanic2. This low participation by communities of color holds true for lung cancer trials, where Black people comprise 15% of participants and Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics comprise less than 4% each3.

This can have significant consequences. A 2019 analysis showed that Black and Hispanic groups are “consistently underrepresented” in landmark oncology trials that lead to FDA drug approvals4. Representation Matters. Treatments can work differently in people. So, it is important to understand how all people of all ages and racial and ethnic groups respond to them. Given that lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, representative participation of racial and ethnic minorities in lung cancer clinical trials has the potential to significantly improve cancer disparities5.

We encourage everyone diagnosed with lung cancer to speak with their treatment team about whether a clinical trial may be an appropriate treatment choice.  GO2 for Lung Cancer’s LungMATCH specialists can also help identify clinical trials that may be right for you. It is important that people from all communities enroll in trials so that we can learn how new treatments work for people of any age, gender, race, and ethnicity.

1 Unger, J. M., Vaidya, R., Hershman, D. L., Minasian, L. M., & Fleury, M. E. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the magnitude of structural, clinical, and physician and patient barriers to cancer clinical trial participation. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute111(3), 245-255.
2 Kwiatkowski, K., Coe, K., Bailar, J. C., & Swanson, G. M. (2013). Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: have we improved?. Cancer119(16), 2956-2963.
3 Pang, H. H., Wang, X., Stinchcombe, T. E., Wong, M. L., Cheng, P., Ganti, A. K., … & Redman, M. W. (2016). Enrollment trends and disparity among patients with lung cancer in national clinical trials, 1990 to 2012. Journal of Clinical Oncology34(33), 3992.
4 Loree, J. M., Anand, S., Dasari, A., Unger, J. M., Gothwal, A., Ellis, L. M., … & Raghav, K. (2019). Disparity of race reporting and representation in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008 to 2018. JAMA Oncol 5: e191870–e191870.
5 Zullig, L. L., Sims, K. J., McNeil, R., Williams, C. D., Jackson, G. L., Provenzale, D., & Kelley, M. J. (2017). Cancer incidence among patients of the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: 2010 update. Military medicine182(7), e1883-e1891.